Into the Inferno

Prepper Score
7.5
Disaster
Year:
2016
Rating:
NR

An exploration of active volcanoes around the world.

Prepper Review

Into the Inferno is not a survival film in the usual sense. Nobody builds a shelter, and nobody packs a bug out bag. What Werner Herzog and volcanologist Clive Oppenheimer offer instead is a reminder that the ground beneath us is not as stable as modern life assumes. They travel from the lava lakes of Vanuatu to the sacred mountain of Paektu in North Korea and the fossil beds of Ethiopia. Along the way they show how volcanoes shape landscapes, cultures, and occasionally the fate of entire civilizations. For a prepper, that perspective is valuable on its own: natural disasters do not negotiate, and they do not care how comfortable your routine has become.

The most useful moments come from the archival footage of Katia and Maurice Krafft. They spent their lives filming eruptions up close and died together when a pyroclastic flow swept over them in Japan. Their story is a lesson in normalcy bias and familiarity with danger. Even the people who understood volcanoes best were caught off guard. The discussions of Laki and Toba widen the lens further. They show how a single eruption can trigger crop failures and famine across continents, the kind of cascading supply disruption that justifies a deep pantry and a plan for lean years.

Viewers looking for checklists and techniques will come away wanting more, because Herzog cares more about awe, faith, and human folly than about evacuation routes or ash masks. Still, the film is beautifully shot, completely real, and it lingers in the mind. It is worth an evening for any self-reliant viewer who wants to understand one of nature's most powerful threats. Afterward, it is worth checking whether your own region has volcanic, seismic, or other natural hazards you have been ignoring.

Into the Inferno
Runtime:
104
mins
IMDB:
7.2
Rotten Tomatoes:
92
%

Possibility

Could this scenario actually happen?
10

Everything depicted here is documented reality. The film visits active volcanoes in Indonesia, Vanuatu, Ethiopia, Iceland, and North Korea. It draws on historical events such as the 1783 Laki fissure eruption, which poisoned livestock and contributed to famine across Europe, and the ancient Toba supereruption, which may have pushed early humans to the brink. Around 1,350 potentially active volcanoes exist worldwide, and hundreds of millions of people live within range of them. A destructive eruption somewhere on Earth is a question of when, not if, which makes this scenario as plausible as it gets.

Realism

Does it play out like real life would?
9

As a documentary, the film shows real eruptions, real lava lakes, and real communities living under active volcanoes, so its realism is high. Herzog and Oppenheimer stand at the rims of glowing craters, and the Krafft footage carries the most sobering truth: the two volcanologists, among the most experienced observers in the world, were killed along with dozens of others by a pyroclastic flow at Mount Unzen in 1991. People are also shown behaving as people really do. Villagers resettle the fertile slopes after every eruption, and belief systems grow up around the mountain. The score falls short of perfect only because Herzog's narration is openly poetic and personal. It sometimes favors mood and myth over a clear explanation of how eruptions unfold or how authorities and residents actually respond during a crisis.

Educational

Is there anything worth learning here?
5

Practical value is moderate, and much of it is implied rather than taught. Viewers learn that pyroclastic flows move too fast to outrun and that even experts misjudge safe distances, as the Krafft deaths show. The lesson is to respect exclusion zones and leave early rather than linger to watch. The material on Laki and Toba is a reminder that a distant eruption can disrupt climate, crops, and food prices far from the volcano. That supports the case for long-term food storage and resilient supply plans. The film also shows how communities repeatedly return to hazardous ground. It is a quiet prompt to research the natural hazards where you live. However, there is no discussion of evacuation planning, respiratory protection from ash, water contamination, or go-bag preparation, so the specific steps are left for the viewer to work out.