Alive

Prepper Score
8.2
Group Survival
Year:
1993
Rating:
R
In 1972, the Uruguayan rugby team is flying to Chile to play a game. However, the plane from the Uruguayan Air Force with 45 people crashes on the Andes Mountains and after the search party, they are considered dead. Two months after the crash, the sixteen survivors are finally rescued. Along the days, the starved survivors decide to eat flesh from the bodies of their comrades to survive.

Prepper Review

Alive is essential viewing for anyone who studies survival under extreme conditions, because it is not fiction but a careful retelling of one of history's most harrowing endurance stories. From a prepper's perspective, the value lies in watching ordinary people, athletes with no wilderness training, adapt to an environment that should have killed all of them within days. The film shows the slow reality of survival: the cold that never relents, the hunger that erodes judgment, and the dwindling hope as search efforts are called off.

What sets this film apart is its refusal to sanitize the choices survival demands. The decision to eat the deceased is treated with gravity and dignity rather than shock value, and it forces the viewer to confront what the will to live truly requires. The improvised water gathering, the makeshift shelter inside the fuselage, and the final desperate trek across the peaks are all instructive examples of resourcefulness and the importance of never surrendering to circumstance.

For the self reliant viewer, Alive rewards close attention. It teaches that preparation includes mental resilience and group organization as much as gear, that rescue cannot be assumed, and that leadership and morale can be the difference between life and death. It is a somber, respectful, and deeply educational film that earns its place in any prepper's library.

Alive
Runtime:
128
mins
IMDB:
7.1
Rotten Tomatoes:
63
%

Possibility

Could this scenario actually happen?
10

This film is a dramatization of the real 1972 Andes flight disaster, in which Uruguayan Air Force Flight 571 crashed in the mountains and survivors endured seventy two days before rescue. Because it depicts documented historical events, the scenario is not merely possible but confirmed to have happened. Aviation accidents in remote terrain, prolonged exposure, and delayed rescue remain genuine risks anyone traveling over mountains or wilderness could face.

Realism

Does it play out like real life would?
9

The film stays remarkably faithful to the true account and portrays the psychological and physical arc of the survivors with honesty. The gradual descent into hypothermia, dehydration, altitude effects, and the agonizing decision to consume the dead are handled without melodrama. The avalanche that killed several survivors, the failed early rescue hopes, and the eventual trek out by two men are all grounded in what actually occurred. Minor Hollywood compressions exist, but character behavior under extreme stress is believable and consistent throughout.

Educational

Is there anything worth learning here?
8

There are concrete lessons here for any prepper. The survivors improvised insulation from seat cushions and luggage, melted snow for water using sheet metal in sunlight, rationed scarce resources, and organized roles among the group. It illustrates the deadly danger of altitude, cold, and the failure to have signaling or emergency gear. The strongest takeaway is the power of leadership, group cohesion, and the willingness to make hard survival decisions rather than passively awaiting rescue. It also underscores that rescue may never come, so self extraction planning matters.