The Quake

Prepper Score
6.9
Disaster
Year:
2018
Rating:
PG-13
In 1904 an earthquake of magnitude 5.4 on the Richter scale shook Oslo, with an epicenter in the "Oslo Graben" which runs under the Norwegian capital. There are now signs that indicate that we can expect a major future earthquake in Oslo.

Prepper Review

The Quake is the Norwegian follow-up to The Wave, and it trades a coastal tsunami for something far more unsettling for city dwellers: the ground itself giving way beneath a modern capital. Anchored by a real 1904 event and genuine geology, the film earns credibility before a single building falls. For a prepper, that grounding matters. This is not a fantasy catastrophe but a dramatization of a hazard that dozens of cities quietly live with, and the slow-burn first half does a good job showing how easy it is to dismiss the warning signs.

Where the movie shines is in atmosphere and consequence. The sense of a familiar urban environment turning lethal in seconds, the scramble through a collapsing high rise, and the helplessness of communication going dark all ring true to how these disasters actually unfold. The weaker notes are the standard disaster-movie beats: the haunted expert nobody listens to, and family members surviving falls and impacts that would end most people. These do not ruin the experience but they do soften the realism in the back half.

Worth watching for the self-reliant viewer, especially anyone living in or near seismic risk or in a dense vertical city. The practical lessons lean toward mindset rather than gear: trust precursor signs, know your building, plan your exits and your rendezvous points, and never assume official calm equals actual safety. It will not teach you to build a bug-out bag, but it drives home why situational awareness and a family plan can be the difference between escape and entrapment.

The Quake
Runtime:
106
mins
IMDB:
6.2
Rotten Tomatoes:
85
%

Possibility

Could this scenario actually happen?
8

Earthquakes are among the most well documented natural hazards on Earth, and the film is grounded in a real historical event, the 1904 Oslo quake, as well as genuine geological features like the Oslo Graben. While Norway is not as seismically active as fault zones along the Pacific Rim, damaging earthquakes strike cities worldwide with regularity and often little warning. The premise that a major quake could hit an urban center that believes itself safe is entirely realistic and has real-world precedent in many regions.

Realism

Does it play out like real life would?
7

The film handles the science reasonably well, showing precursor signals, the difficulty of prediction, and the terrifying speed with which a modern city can turn deadly. The collapse sequences and the behavior of a tall building under stress are dramatized but rooted in real structural failure modes. Where it drifts into Hollywood convention is the lone-expert-who-sees-it-coming trope and the family members improbably surviving extreme falls and collapses. Panic, gridlock, and communication breakdown are portrayed believably, but the protagonist's near-superhuman endurance stretches credibility in the final act.

Educational

Is there anything worth learning here?
6

There are solid takeaways here. The film illustrates the value of heeding early warning signs, the danger of being inside tall or older structures during a quake, and the chaos of evacuating a dense city where infrastructure fails instantly. Preppers can extract lessons about pre-identifying safe spots, keeping family communication plans, understanding that elevators and glass towers become death traps, and recognizing that official reassurance is not the same as safety. It is thinner on concrete gear or supply preparation, focusing more on situational awareness and rapid decision making under collapse conditions.